Reboot Alberta

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Ed Stelmach's Astonishing Election Results

So what did the Alberta election results tell us? The results astonished just about everyone I spoke to except one of my staffers who yesterday about noon predicted 71 PC seats . All the people I know and who are “in the know” about these things were mostly thinking 55-60 seats and some were at the 65 level but we all admitted we did not know for sure. We were all surprised.


I think this result was a vote for change. It was a change away from the "Ralph’s World" but not a desire to change the fundamental governing philosophy of the province from a Progressive and Conservative party. My Stelmach endorsement post the other day asked Albertans to “Give Ed a Chance.” I think that is what many Albertans decided to do as they took the weekend to think about the future of the province and reflect on the choices they had in the election.

The Calgary results show that the “energy industry silk suits” don’t speak for the people of that city. The negative/attack ads against Stelmach done by the Building Trades Council, the Alberta Federation of Labour and later the Alberta Union of Public Employees under the guise of “Albertans for Change” backfired. The belittling branding of Stelmach as just a “Ukrainian Farmer” backfired.


The Liberal campaign tried to tell Albertans that the PC government that they had chosen to govern the province for 37 years had been a mistake...the electorates mistake. Albertans did not believe that nothing had changed in how they were governed in the past 37 years and the strategy backfired. The Liberal campaign ran as much against Ralph Klein’s record and did not focus on the future under them - or Ed Stelmach. I think that strategy misfired.


So 53% of Albertans who showed up, chose a decent man with a big heart who they acknowledged, had spent most of his 15 months as Premier, fixing the screw ups of the past administration. In that 15 months Ed also showed he was prepared to take on big new challenges like the regional governance in the Capital Region, a royalty review that he opened up to all Albertans to read and respond to right along with him and his government. That new openness created an energetic public policy conversation amongst Albertans on big issues - and it was a big change.

I think the Alberta public collected their wisdom together on Election Day and decided Ed was a change, and if nothing else, a change from “Ralph World.” They decided he deserved a real chance to be our Premier but with this own mandate and the opportunity to set his own course. He got his chance in spades in this election and now he has to show us what he will do and how he will do it - without having to pick up after Ralph anymore.

I think there are some serious challenges for the Stelmach PCs. They have some policy blind spots that became apparent in this election but that too can be fixed. The first test of a blind spot that needs fixing from Ed's past will be his Cabinet selection. He can’t repeat the mistakes of an over abundance of loyalty like last time. He should not take the "easy way out" of a larger Cabinet either, because there is no real need to increase the size, at least not significantly.


In fact there is such a dire need for more interdepartmental collaboration in government these days that a key test for any Cabinet appointment should be the person’s ability to collaborate, integrate, design and then execute policy decisions. I am keen that he keeps a small Cabinet and goes forward with his best and brightest people, mixing those of proven experience and ability with some promising newbies - and of course being very very careful to provide the necessary geographical mix.

I know some will be concerned that with 73 seats the Stelmach government may turn arrogant, self-absorbed and self-satisfied. Perhaps that could happen - under a different leader - but not under Ed Stelmach. That is not his nature nor part of his character. He will have to be careful to show that he will not tolerate those attitudes in anyone else in his government either. After all, as the “renewed Premier” says, governing is a privilege that has to be earned. He knows that privilege has to be earned everyday and in every way – not just at election time.


This is part of the point Ed Stelmach made last night at his victory celebration in Edmonton when he said, “It is not about how long you govern but how well you govern.” Let’s get going on some damn good governing!

Congratulations for this victory are also due to the entire Stelmach family – both personal and political. Well done and thank you.

14 comments:

  1. Why be concerned? 72 of 83..............sittings can double for caucus meetings.

    I'm sure all-party committees will sprout like weeds, and closure will never be invoked.

    By basis of comparison, this would be like the fed Conservatives winning 267 of 308 seats in Parliament.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:31 pm

    Some responses:

    Unfortunately it was only 42% not 53% participation- not the PC's fault but a major issue for the province. It was interesting to note that in today's Journal, Councillor Caterina wants community leagues to back of controversial issues! (stifling their desire to make a difference at a local level) - I would suggest that one of our biggest problems is citizen engagement at all levels. This should be a priority of the government; probably not to move to an Australian approach of mandatory voting but to think long and hard about why people are disengaged.

    My biggest concern is that the party was allowed to get away with at best a tepid environmental policy. To wait until 2050 for change is simply not good enough - hopefully some leadership will emerge here. Sorry but the Premier's cautious, balanced approach was not good enough in this area.

    Clearly the PC party learned from the past campaign. They got the additional 500 or so voters out to Edmonton polling stations. This alone was enough to make a big difference. A campaign is much more than the visible leader.

    One cannot help but worry about any sort of a viable opposition (with any chance of emerging as a potential government.) Assuming that it takes positive gains in 2 elections to hope to be seen as credible to form a government we essentially don't have a viable alternative for another 10 years. A number of commentators have noted that perhaps in this province NDP or Liberal-named parties have no hope of being elected. Name change - aka Saskatchewan Party in the offing?

    Finally, some internal housekeeping needs to be done. Ms. Evan's invention of an impending dump so she could challenge the carefully negotiated regional deal (when she would have known that she had a very comfortable majority +5000) was a cheap shot. Does this result in another portfolio? Similarly the suits in Calgary including the CEO of the health region played with the dagger - and its not even the Ides yet! Do we send a $115m check to buy off Jack? Interesting when probably the most stress in the campaign was managing people who were supposed to be on side.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8:09 pm

    Bravo Ken,
    Well said my learned friend. I watched the results from our Maui condo and could not believe the color commentating by Former Premier Ralph Klein on Global. He predicted a disastrous result of 50 seats and overall was quite negative. Once the numbers starting to show the landslide, he back-tracked like crazy to the point of even stating he had backed Ed in the PC leadership race. I must have been asleep when that happened. A bigger joke was the Global reporter interviewing a big dog in the Kevin Taft celebration when he predicted the Liberals would form the government, even when it was announced that the PCs were leading in 50 ridings. I'm not sure what he was smoking that night but with guidance like that, no wonder soon-to-be former Liberal Leader Dr. Taft had to fight hard to keep his seat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes Global content sucked but they did have the best riding info on the crawl on the bottom of the screen.

    Having Klein in for commentary was boneheaded too...not just because of what he said but ex premiers shold stay "ex" (that means keep your own counsel - a polite way to say butt out) at least for the term of the next leader.

    Getty was that racious and Lougheed even more so.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous10:00 pm

    Sorry Ken, I really can't agree of your assessment of Stelmach. Too much evidence suggests otherwise.

    I see Stelmach as the guy who was minister of infrastructure for several years at the end of the Klein era and did absolutely nothing to halt the problems that were mounting. That either suggests he was too cowed by Klein to do anything, too ineffectual at his job to get anything done, or too complacent riding on the coat-tails of Kleinpower to care. None of which bode well for a supermajority government like he has now.

    I see the EUB private-eyes and the subsequent splitting of the EUB into the side with power that does not engage with the people, and the side that engages with the people being given no power. (Which suggest the third option listed above)

    I see victories such as the teachers benefit plan that are essentially throwing a shovel full of money at them. Sure, he took the initiative, but with a 4+ billion dollar surplus, and a teacher's board threatening to strike come election time, it's not exactly a "tough" decision for anybody who likes their political job.

    I see failures such as the Royalty Review. A good idea in concept, but completely flawed in execution, taking no notice of the real world (gas difficulties & real threats to the environment) and that just reminds me of the old "save maintenance on highways by switching the high-speed and low-speed lanes."

    I see his lip-service to the environment being trumped by his refusal "to touch the brakes" on the economy.

    I see Mr. Ed refusing to acknowledge that there's a significant problem in a political party deciding who the RO's will be, or in his repeated confusion between government resources and party resources.

    I see a post-secondary education plan that is basically the minimum he could promise without sparking widespread student revolt, despite there being increasing warnings about a national skills shortage.

    I don't doubt he's a nice guy and has the best of intentions. But we all know where nice guys finish and what road the best intentions pave.

    Unfortunately, there's nothing I can do now but live with it, and hope that I'm incredibly wrong. Or if I'm right, that the incompetence won't come home to roost for at least another 3-4 years or so.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Anon @ 10 - good comments...and I have responses to give an explanation to most of them...just too bagged tonight to reply...will do so tomorrow.

    Goodnight

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous11:10 pm

    So much for the Cadman affair:

    OTTAWA - The crucial date of May 17, 2005 - the date on which Conservatives allegedly offered dying MP Chuck Cadman a $1-million insurance policy in exchange for his vote - has been removed from the final version of a book that has sparked a political storm on Parliament Hill.

    Publisher Howard White told Canwest News Service on Tuesday that he "stopped the presses" to update the book with Prime Minister Stephen Harper's denial that party officials tried to bribe Cadman and to remove the May 17 date cited by Cadman's widow as when her husband received an offer from unidentified Conservative representatives.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous7:09 am

    Ken, you have every right to celebrate and enthuse about the very clear and strong mandate given to Mr. Stelmach. The Tories, and those of you who worked so hard for them over the past years, can be very proud of what was essentially a clean, error-free campaign.

    But I'm afraid your enthusiasm may be biasing your analysis a bit. Anonymous @ 10:00 made the points about whether Mr. Stelmach is really as gold-plated as you believe. To that analysis, I would add his very fiscally conservative roots which he has either abandoned, or has kept well disguised. How will that play out in this huge majority?

    Secondly, I would question your sense that this is an overwhelming endorsement of any kind. The voter turnout is too pathetic for words. I know conventional wisdom says that low turnout favours the opposition, so I won't argue that more voters would have changed the results. But why did so many not vote, and what were the dynamics that got enough (just) of the Tory vote out to turn Edmonton back around? I wonder if the people who really benefit from the Alberta Advantage got just scared enough to come out and protect their privileged positions. One thing for sure. Nobody who voted Tory is voting for real change.

    Mic

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous7:35 am

    Voter turnout was 41%! Not so great for democracy. The choices were so bad and the visions so weak that voters decided to stay home.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous9:04 am

    While you're at it Ken, an explanation regarding Stelmach's last minute order-in-council changing the start date of his conflict of interest legislation would be much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous10:45 am

    I believe the biggest test for the new super-majority government will be the environment. There is abundant scientific evidence now that the province is heading down a very treacherous road. Species like grizzly bears and caribou are in serious trouble, largely as a result of our booming resource extraction industries and lack of adequate care for the landscape. We are Canada's biggest greenhouse gas emitter. The currently trajectory in both these issue areas is not good.

    Action to date has been tentative at best. The "14 percent in 42 years" goal of our climate change is policy is laughable. The stalling and obfuscation on species protection and recovery has been frustrating, the lack of action on protected areas embarrassing. Alberta has a growing international reputation as an environmental laggard, if not scoundrel.

    The strong new mandate given to the PC's puts the question squarely in front of them: will you use your new power to dig in your heals, damn the torpedos and continue to place industrial opportunities ahead of environmental responsiblity, or will you use this as an opportunity to act creatively and boldly to reverse our downward environmental slide? The world is watching.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am with you One Alberta Voter - great comment. See my post of March 5th and let me know your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous3:07 pm

    Ken
    Some of the Calgary 'Oil Barons' - along with their media flacks- still don't get it. The PC vote emerged as powerfully as it did because Ed Stelmach was perceived to have stood up to Big Oil in a way that left Albertans feel that their interests were being protected. Kevin Taft lost a dozen seats by out-dithering Paul Martin when it came to responding to the Hunter Panel.
    Can anyone help me understand the thought processes- if indeed there are any- of Brian Mason?
    His comment two days before the election that it was going to be a PC sweep undercut a lot of hard by opposition party workers across the province. It appears to me that as the leader of a political party, Mr. mason is a good bus driver.
    TOPD

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous comments are discouraged. If you have something to say, the rest of us have to know who you are