Reboot Alberta

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Budget Deficit + No Tax Increase = Serious Social Service Cuts for Albertans

Hunker down Alberta - and get ready for a raft of the public sector job cuts plus social services and community based program cuts. This is the only logical conclusion to come to based on the "no tax increase" announcement of Premier Stelmach today.

Given the game plan of the government, that stated with the Premier's reported comments today, of no tax increases, the multi-billion dollar budget deficit monster will only be tackled by program and staff cuts. Unless natural gas prices rebound dramatically, like right away, and they stay high for the rest of the year, Alberta has a chronic revenue problem. With a glut of natural gas on the market and stored oil supplies growing, prices for these commodities are not likely to escalate soon and not enough to deliver us from the fiscal evil we are facing.

Will there be a bunch of social services program downloading on municipalities too? This is going to be helpful just when as many as 60 Alberta municipalities are into formal dissolution processes that would terminate their municipal status. They are doing this because they can't sustain themselves on property taxes and current grant levels anymore. That should be interesting if social services downloading happens.

We have been told by our government that they are going to run some serious operational budget deficits right now and looking forward into the next few years. Cumulative deficits have a nasty habit of tuning into long term debts. We're Albertans. We know that because we have been there.

What a difference from February 2008, just before the last election, when Premier Stelmach said our PC government would never put Alberta back into a deficit position. Now he is saying deficits are back. The Premier's response to new deficits has been to reaffirm that there will be "no tax increases" on his watch. And to ensure the message hits home he is going the extra mile. He is actually reversing the recent tax increase on liquor that was passed in the April 2009 Budget.

News reports indicate that the liquor tax cut will cost the public purse $180m a year - just at a time when Alberta needs all the revenues it can get its hands on. This tax cut is even more unnecessary than Bill 44 was. It is enough to drive you to drink.

Media reports also quote the Premier as saying the liquor tax decrease can be in place this weekend. Funny how we cut a sin tax so assuredly and so swiftly but we can't figure out to ensure we are getting all our non-renewable energy resource royalites accounted for and properly collected.

What is going on? We have serious problems balancing the public purse. Understood!. We are running large deficits in health care. Shift happens! We have record deficits in our general accounts and they are getting larger. And our policy response is to absolutely rule out tax increases?

Not only that, but our official government policy is to go a step further to prove the point that taxes are not going to increase in Stelmach's Alberta. Damn the torpedoes. We have to put some serious emphasis to the political point about no tax increases. We have to announce an immediate reduction a liquor based sin tax? What gives? Is this the essence of the new fiscal plan for Alberta?

The only other option left, and that is actually within our control, is for Alberta us to get after the record deficit by government dramatically reducing social program spending. The biggies of health, education, children's services, seniors and social services can't be protected from cuts - especially with this brand of fiscal folly.

Our most vulnerable citizens, like the sick, elderly, children-at-risk and the disabled have just been put on notice that they are going to become even more vulnerable. Their caregivers, especially those community based not-for-profit agencies, have just been put on notice. They already have to squeeze their nickles until the beaver shits. More program and other cuts have yet to come, but rest assured, they are coming! So theses social service agencies better get a firmer grip on that nickle and start squeezing that beaver even harder.

This is ridiculous. All options need to be on the table to help Alberta address the fiscal force fields we are facing. Eliminating tax policy entirely as an budget option is all about pure political ideology and illogical fiscal policy. What is going on? I see half a policy step forward and three policy steps back these days in Alberta.

You are a wiser man than that Premier Stelmach. Reconsider your comments and conclusions. Do it right away before even more irreparable damage is done to the Progressive Conservative brand in Alberta. Bill 44 was bad enough. This is beyond the pale.

HERE IS AN UPDATE LINK TO THE CANADIAN TAXPAYERS FEDERATION NEWS RELEASE PRAISING PREMIER STELMACH FOR ANNOUNCING NO TAX INCREASES AND QUOTING MINISTERS LIEPERT, SNELGROVE, MORTON, EVANS SAYING ALL OPTION TO ADDRESS DEFICITS HAVE TO BE OPEN. Note to Reader - all these Ministers sit on Treasury Board with Premier Stelmach. The plot thickens.

7 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:53 pm

    Ken is right. Massive spending cuts are coming, and I'd say much like the Klein years in the 90's. These cuts served Alberta well and paved the way for the last ten years of prosperity. Let's have another round!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:38 pm

    Ken. It is hard to be at all encouraged by the government's lack of leadership. If you look at any file, any Ministry, any issue it is hard (if not impossible) to find a place that the present government is demonstrating front-of-the pack leadership.

    Sadly what the media and others are not discussing fully is the immense damage that is occurring in many different sectors. For example, in health, the centralization initiative, (partially, at least) contrived financial crisis, combined with the leadership styles and approaches by both the Minister and the new CEO, there is a palpable sense of fear and deep concern that a number of years of solid work has been lost. For example, It is completely ironic that the new economic advisory council could be looking at how our economy could be more knowledge based and innovative through health sector initiatives but as a result of narrow-mindedness and punitive approaches this will not be possible.

    Sad really, at a time when we face deep challenges and the need for creative and bold leadership (participative as opposed to a single individual) that the province is so lacking. This government looks timid, tired and devoid of ideas. While many hoped that the new leader would bring a different style and vision at least from my vantage point these are disappointing at best and more likely damaging.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous11:20 pm

    it's time to privatize health care. It's bankrupting the province.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous @ 11:20 writes:

    it's time to privatize health care. It's bankrupting the province.

    Great ... so just bankrupt all the citizens instead. Lovely.

    Not all of us are wealthy enough to be able to afford that lovely private insurance plan - assuming we aren't disqualified for coverage by "pre-existing conditions".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:44 pm

    I agree with whoever said to privatize health care. There can still be a public system but let's start offering a choice - the lack of choice is causting ridiculous wait times and cost overruns. Time to move towards more private involvement and save everyone time and money.

    If MgS doesn't like it, he can try out the other two countries that don't have choice: North Korea and Cuba. Enjoy communism. Not.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Waht do you mean "privatize?" Every physician is now an independent contractor, as are dentists, labs and pharmacies etc. DO you want to eliminate the single pay or be able to buy your way to the front of the line? In fact we have a parallel private system now - it is called the United States of America. Don't go to North Korea or Cuba for care - go the the States - the Cdn private medical system. Pay your own way and care too.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous11:03 pm

    Why should we send our money to the United States? Allow a parallel system here where those who want to pay take themselves out of the queue and move everyone else up. In the mean time, we collect more tax revenue and retain more of our medical professionals. Win-win, unlike the lose-lose system we have now.

    Time for choice!

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous comments are discouraged. If you have something to say, the rest of us have to know who you are